Thursday, May 16, 2013

Four Last Songs

Well, maybe Toscanini said it best: “For Strauss the composer, I take off my hat; for Strauss the man, I put it back on.”

Ouch. But there may have been some good reasons for Richard Strauss to be unpleasant. He was born in 1864 into a musical family; his father was a horn player in the Court Opera of Munich, and Richard Strauss grew up attending rehearsals of the Munich Court Orchestra.

He began composing young, and also conducting; he became the protégé of Hans von Bülow, who determined that Strauss would succeed him as conductor of the Meiningen orchestra.

His early compositions are in the tradition of Schumann and Mendelssohn; his work later became progressively more modern. And whatever else he was, he was a master of composing for the human voice, specifically the female voice. That’s not surprising, his wife—whom Wikipedia charitably describes as “irascible, garrulous, eccentric and outspoken”—was a famous soprano.

The couple had a son, who married a Jewish woman, Alice von Grab. In the Second World War, Strauss initially cooperates with Hitler, of whom he had a low opinion. In fact, Strauss became the president of the Reichsmusikkammer, the State Music Bureau. Later, he interceded several times to protect his daughter-in-law, even going to the Theresienstadt concentration camp to plead for the release of Alice’s mother. And he makes it clear in his diary of his contempt for the Nazis, writing, “I consider the Streicher-Goebbels Jew-baiting as a disgrace to German honour, as evidence of incompetence—the basest weapon of untalented, lazy mediocrity against a higher intelligence and greater talent.”

It tarnished him, this association with the Nazis, and may have been the reason for Toscanini’s remark above. But there’s no question, Straus looked at horror at what had become of his country, and wrote, “the most terrible period of human history is at an end, the twelve year reign of bestiality, ignorance and anti-culture under the greatest criminals, during which Germany's 2000 years of cultural evolution met its doom.”

In 1945, he was liberated by the Americans; he was also 81. He wrote his last works, of which the Four Last Songs are perhaps the most famous. He never lived to hear them performed; he died in 1949, the songs were first performed by Kirsten Flagstad in 1950.

There’s some question if Strauss meant the four song to be a unified set; the first three might be, since they are all based on poems by Hermann Hesse, the last is by Joseph von Eichendorff. In fact, it was the publisher who put them together and called them the Four Last Songs.

Whatever he meant, they’re some of the most beautiful, most haunting, most autumnal works around. By the end, Strauss seems beyond sorrow, even beyond acceptance; he seems transfigured.

Song 1: Spring

In shadowy crypts

I dreamt long

of your trees and blue skies,

of your fragrance and birdsong.



Now you appear

in all your finery,

drenched in light

like a miracle before me.



You recognize me,

you entice me tenderly.

All my limbs tremble
at
your blessed presence!




Song 2: September

The garden is in mourning.

Cool rain seeps into the flowers.

Summertime shudders,

quietly awaiting his end.



Golden leaf after leaf
falls
from the tall acacia tree.

Summer smiles, astonished and feeble,

at his dying dream of a garden.



For just a while he tarries

beside the roses,
yearning for repose.

Slowly he closes
his weary eyes.





Song 3: Going To Sleep

Now that I am wearied of the day,

my ardent desire shall happily receive

the starry night

like a sleepy child.



Hands, stop all your work.

Brow, forget all your thinking.

All my senses now
yearn
to sink into slumber.



And my unfettered soul

wishes to soar up freely

into night's magic sphere

to live there deeply and thousandfold.





Song 4: At Sunset

We have gone through sorrow and joy

hand in hand;
Now we can rest from our wandering

above the quiet land.



Around us, the valleys bow;

the air is growing darker.

Just two skylarks soar upwards

dreamily into the fragrant air.



Come close to me, and let them flutter.

Soon it will be time for sleep.

Let us not lose our way
in this solitude.



O vast, tranquil peace,

so deep at sunset!

How weary we are of wandering--

Is this perhaps death?

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

The Wonderful World of Greg Karber


OK—some days even bloggers get a gift. Mostly it’s uphill, you know—not every day has a British prince hitting baseballs with a bunch of blacks kids in Harlem, or a Venezuelan dude becoming director of the LA Phil.

So how likely was it that I’d strike it rich three times in a row? Because that’s what happened, when a gentleman who has now gone viral, Greg Karber, dropped into my day with his brilliant idea: give Abercrombie& Fitch clothing to the homeless.

Damn, why are everybody else’s ideas better than mine? No wonder he goes viral; it was an idea someone just had to think of. A & F, as you may remember, has decided that they only want cool people in their store, and in their clothes as well. So they don’t donate defective merchandise to people who might need it, they burn the clothes.

Douchebags, is what Karber calls them, and it’s an assessment that’s pretty hard to challenge. What’s wonderful, however, is the sheer ingenuity of Karber’s scheme, as well as its interesting twist: doing well by doing good.

Doing well because his video has gotten 1, 263, 997 hits on YouTube. Oh, and it was uploaded on May 13, 2013. So it will be interesting to see—writing a post usually takes an hour or so; how many hits will he have had by the time I finish this thing?

Well, it has to be said, Karber needs no help from this blogger—he’s made it! Yup, he’s doing the 15 minutes of fame. Take a look at this clip, and tell me he’s not wonderful….. 
  



Right, so what else has the guy done? Well, you can check out his website, which with breathtaking logic is called http://www.gregkarber.com .

Do it and you’ll see a guy who’s clearly done his work. Take a look at the clip below, which has been taken from his Greg Carber Video Show.



Nor is this enough for the imaginatively fecund Karber / Carber. Here he goes into the tantalizing world of the Ouija board…



The supernatural seems to be a common theme in—oh, what the hell, let's call it the—oeuvre of Karber. Take a look at the clip below....



Of course, every guy has a serious side, so that's why Karber had to do the koan of the day....



Lastly, there's this fascinating clip of the number pi.



Right, and here's what Karber says about it....

1. What is This?

225 Digits of π is a mathematic auralizer, a system by which the digits of π are converted to music. The piece was conceived and created by Amin Osman and Greg Karber.
You can purchase it on iTunes.

2. The Structure of 225 Digits of π.

The digits 0-9 were mapped to two octaves of a pentatonic scale.
We chose the pentatonic scale for three reasons. Firstly, each octave contains five notes, so the digits may be mapped evenly onto two octaves. Secondly, since the pentatonic scale lacks semitones and tritones, its pitches can be played in almost any arrangement without creating dissonance.
Thirdly, as this wonderful performance by Bobby McFerrin illustrates, the pentatonic scale seems hardwired into our brains. A fundamental scale for a fundamental number.
We chose the key of A and assigned the digits as follows:
0 = A2
1 = B2
2 = C#3
3 = E3
4 = F#3
5 = A3
6 = B3
7 = C#4
8 = E4
9 = F#4
However, while using the pentatonic scale removes dissonance, it also eliminates tension. As such, we added a bassline which followed a simple chord progression:
F#m F#m
D D
F#m F#m
D D
A A
F#m F#m
E A
This contextualized π's melody and gave it a dynamism which did not exist on its own.
We additionally mapped the a spectrum of colors to each of the digits, as follows:
0 = 0
1 = 0
2 = 0
3 = 0
4 = 0
5 = 0
6 = 0
7 = 0
8 = 0
9 = 0
A pastel spectrum was chosen for the same reason as the pentatonic scale: we felt it would produce less dissonance and be more pleasing to the senses.

3. Why π Fascinates Us.

π is, of course, most well known for expressing the relationship between the diameter and the circumference of a circle.
C = πd
However, this is not the only occurence of π. It recurs in several fields of mathematics, from statistics to number theory, often in situations where the connection to circles is difficult to fathom.
The most striking of these, perhaps, is this version of the Leibniz series:
This series sums so slowly it takes 300 terms before it is accurate for the first two digits of π. To calculate 10 correct decimal points of π would require five billion terms.
So get out your calculator.
Early mathematicians believed π to be rational, meaning they thought it could be represented by one whole number divided by another. Sometimes these mathematicians claimed that π equaled 22/7. It doesn't, but 22/7 is accurate for the first two digits, and that's close enough for almost all ancient uses.
You only need about 40 decimal places of π to calculate the circumference of the known universe to within a margin of error of about half the diameter of a proton.
The digits of π are thought to be random. However, no proof of such randomness exists. (If you could prove it, you could get a lot of attention and probably a number of new Twitter followers.)
If π is random, then its infinite length means that every finite pattern that could possibly exist exists within it. This has some mindblowing consequences. For example, let's say that we assigned each letter of the alphabet to a two-digit number:
A = 01
B = 02
C = 03
...
X = 24
Y = 25
Z = 26 
Assuming randomness, every single possible string of letters would be represented somewhere within π. This would include the Declaration of Independence, the lyrics to Gungnam Style, and the complete works of Shakespeare.

4. An Unfinishable Symphony...

While π never ends, "225 Digits of Pi" does. (Obviously, it ends after 225 digits.) However, this does not necessarily have to be so.
Through procedural generation, the digits of π could be determined on-the-fly by a computer, which could assign the digits to tones automatically (eliminating the very tedious project of individually entering notes). Then, the bassline, beat, and other assorted instruments could be cued to enter and leave based on a few simple rules.
If the rules were clever enough, they could retain musical dynamism indefinitely, so that the piece could -- thereotically -- go on forever...

What a guy—hunh? He does all this cool stuff, and he's funny too. Damn, and guess what?

Abercrombie & Fitch is at 1, 488, 103....