Monday, February 23, 2015

Conservatory Days

For one reason or another, I spent the weekend pondering the education of classical musicians, since at one time that was what I wanted someone to do to me, and at another time, it was what I had to do to myself.

Here was the standard thinking: Music was a demanding art, requiring the highest discipline, and very, very few of us would do much of anything except, if we were lucky, manage to get into an orchestra. There, we would scrape away or toot away or bang away (can’t forget the percussion guys) for forty years at the standard repertoire, which meant that we would have memorized Beethoven’s Fifth. All of this for the delectation of blue-haired ladies who had dragged their husbands—all yearning for the golf course—to the concerts.

So it was a schizophrenia that was almost ordained. We were being trained for something that we would never be. We spent enormous amounts of time in practice rooms, where we learned pieces that almost none of us would ever play. I have memorized, for example, over 10 concerti, each one lasting about 30 minutes. So that’s five hours of music, but how many minutes in my life have I played them with an orchestra?

Forty minutes, since I won a concerto competition in high school.

So we were learning pieces that we would almost certainly never play in careers that we would almost certainly never have. That bad, but hardly the worst of it. The real problem was that our teachers were professionally obliged to stifle any innate kindness or altruism, and instead assault us in ways ranging from the subtle to the outright abusive. Why? To toughen us up, since it was a dog-eat-dog world out there, and only the tough survived.

And of course, to us it made sense. We had practiced five hours, but Betty? She had done six, and that last hour would make the difference…or so we thought. And perhaps it did, if Betty believed it, and if it made her more secure for the competition, the recital, the concert or—especially and most dreadfully—the audition.

So Betty would sail into the audition, sit behind the curtain—that essential if make-believe pretense of impartiality, since everybody knew what Betty was playing, as well as what everybody else was playing—and perform magnificently. She had done her work, she had braved her teacher, whose preferred way of receiving whatever Betty had brought into her lesson was to sit in utter silence for one or two long minutes, after which he would light a cigarette (you could do that then), and tear into her.

I now know—he was probably an unhappy man, this teacher that we all (perhaps most of all himself) put on a pedestal. In my case, the teacher had been one of a family of musicians, had performed early on with the Chicago Symphony, and then had gone—without a degree—to teach at the university. There he had stayed for forty years or so, turning out students, only a few of whom had made their careers in music.

No, I suspect he wasn’t a very happy man, because here’s the thing about classical music: For some reason it’s OK to be a good doctor or a good lawyer, but a musician who is simply good? Who is a serviceable cellist, but not Yo-Yo Ma or Rostropovich? Well, he’s second best at best—often he’s just a hack.

So he was unhappy, and he was teaching us as he had been taught, which was to play despite an unceasing flood of negative commentary. Which meant that for a student to be “good,” he had to be hard on himself. For an overachiever like me, that meant variously swearing at myself or biting myself. Oh, and curiously, I had this little problem breathing: I held my breath until anoxia forced me to gasp. Nice metaphor—right? I was being strangled, though only my body knew it at the time. My brain thought I was just being weak.

Right—so into this mix was added the instruction: If only I would “relax,” I would play so much better! So the “work” then became to “relax,” and what was wrong with me, since I was trying really, really hard to get those shoulders down—they had been tickling my ears for a decade or so. Anyway, I was working so hard on the shoulders that I was actually forcing them down artificially low, which was causing its set of tensions, so that accounted for my own thin, strained sounds, whereas Betty—well, she seemed immune to any tension whatsoever, and her sound? Rostropovich would have melted!

It wasn’t Betty, of course. Or rather it was, since she was a girl, and girls didn’t come in for quite the same level of toughness that boys did. Since I was going to have to make my living, but Betty? Guys, this was the 70’s, but even now it’s the same. She could have a career, yes, or she could play chamber music and let her lawyer husband support her….

And we all knew—Betty had an instrument to die for: Not a Strad, but a gorgeous Italian instrument from the same period. So she was rich, which is a nice cushion for the arrows that might come her way, as she made her way through the forest primeval. So Betty had never quite got the toughness the rest of us got, and she had that ease of dealing with people that people with money have.

Betty went on to do well: I did not. Or did I? Because at last, I conquered the inner voice, I learned to “relax,” which was just the opposite of what I had been trying to do. And along the way, I had been a nurse, been a teacher, repaired antiques, done construction work for a summer, moved to a foreign though domestic land, learned another language, and written a book. To a classical musician this is dilettantism, the most awful face of amateurism. But is it?

He had a technique I’ll never have, that teacher of mine. He undoubtedly had the skills to pass the auditions I never could pass. And now, he is old, a professor emeritus even without a degree. He has, in short, gone far beyond me.

Or has he?    

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 



Wednesday, February 18, 2015

The Wisconsin Practice

I didn’t want to write about it for a couple of reasons: The New York Times had come out two days ago with an op-ed piece about Governor Scott Walker and his attempt to reinvent the Wisconsin Idea, which is often expressed by the maxim, “the boundaries of the university are the boundaries of the state.” Walker proposed changing this with some gag-inducing talk about meeting the needs of the work force, with the clear implication that it was time for all of those dreamy-eyed professors to set aside Plato and Shakespeare and get to the real job at hand: Teaching coding, perhaps, rather than the theoretical mathematics that would allow for the creation of a computer, or artificial intelligence.  And so if the Times had spoken, what had I to add?

But it nagged at me, since I had grown up very much with the Wisconsin Idea, which in our Madison home came in the form of radio waves. Wisconsin Public Radio, it now is—in my day, it was WHA, and the slogan, “the oldest station in the nation,” still rings in my years. Was it? Perhaps not, but it was among the first, and a very improving and wonderful thing it was. On the coldest of winter days, you had the consolation of hearing directly from the weatherman or the station manager in Brule, Wisconsin, that Madison was a mere climatological skip away from Miami Beach. You had concerts broadcast at you by University of Wisconsin faculty, and lectures as well. Books were read at noon, and the opera arrived on Saturday afternoon from the Met. And was anyone listening? Well, I was, and I can tell you that someone else in the state was too, since Milton Cross, the announcer since forever for the Met, once had a question from a listener in Baraboo, Wisconsin. The problem? I never heard the question, since I was laughing too hard at the wonderful—and most operatic—change in pronunciation from the Wisconsin “BARE-a-boo” to “bar-AH-boe.” I swear, Cross even rolled the “r.”

So the Wisconsin Idea was something very much around—no idle talk, for all the “sifting and winnowing” that got thrown about. Some of the fruit took a while to ripen: I heard the soprano Bettina Bjorksten analyze Die Winterreise years before I was strong enough to listen to it and appreciate it, but that didn’t matter. It was on my list of music I was going to get to, even decades later.

What I didn’t know, until Walker tried to gut it, was how much more the Wisconsin Idea was, nor how widely it travelled and how extensive was its impact. It was the intellectual foundation of the Progressive Movement, and Robert La Follette, Sr., took many of its ideas and made them reality. Here I give you Wikipedia’s summary:

    Primary elections, allowing the rank-and-file members of a political party to choose its nominees rather than caucuses usually dominated by political bosses.
   Workers' compensation, allowing workers injured whilst working to receive a fixed payment in compensation for their injuries and related expenses rather than forcing them to go to court against their employers, which at the time was extremely difficult and had little realistic chance of success.
   State regulation of railroads in addition to the federal regulation imposed by the Interstate Commerce Commission.
   Direct election of United States Senators as opposed to the original method of their selection by the state legislatures, eventually ratified as the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
·      Progressive taxation, where the wealthier pay a higher rate of tax than the less-affluent, made possible on the federal level in part by the adoption of the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

For a Wisconsin governor to wage war on the Wisconsin Idea, then, was to go much further than to change the mission of the university: It was an attempt to rewrite the state’s history, to deny it, and ultimately to reject it.

So the Times had weighed in on Walker, the Washington Post as well, even Bloomberg, which was an eye-opener, since it revealed that:

In the late 1980s, eight public universities ranked in the top 25 nationally, according to the admittedly imperfect U.S. News and World Report assessment. The top one, the University of California at Berkeley, came in fifth. Today, Berkeley remains the top-ranked public university, but it has fallen to 20th place overall; two other public universities barely made the top 25.

And where is the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the flagship of the system? We are a shameful 47th nationally.

So what are we seeing? Can anyone really believe that this is an assault on state universities, and a cynical one at that?

Right—so others were saying it, but why was it nagging me so? Why speak when so many others with louder voices than mine had been raised? There was something I needed to remember, but what was it?

The back burner came through, or was it hearing the oboe solo in the Barber Violin Concerto? Because that led to Emily Auerbach, since before she had emerged as a Professor of English at the University of Wisconsin, she had been an oboist in the Wisconsin Youth Symphony Orchestra, which after almost fifty years has enrolled over 5000 kids from around the state to make classical music, and if that’s not the Wisconsin Idea, well, it’s damn close. But Auerbach—who could have rested on her laurels after writing a book on Jane Austin which won praise from, among others, Margaret Drabble—decided to start the Odyssey Program, which is nationally acclaimed as a trend setter, since it is more than just a year-long program for thirty students, many of them mired in poverty, addiction, homelessness, and problems that Walker and I and too-few others can only imagine. You don’t learn on an empty stomach, so there’s food—real food—before class. And what about the kids? Right—so there’s day care.

It’s education—yes—and the students get six credits from the University of Wisconsin, but it’s much more than that. As you can see below, it’s a fight for the students' soul, a fight to get the student to believe that yes, he or she can do it. And so a kid who grew up with his mother addicted to crack cocaine turns into a cop, and is in turn visiting schools with the message: You can turn your life around.

And the program seems both academically rigorous and effective: All 30 students graduated in May of last year. But the telling detail was—did I imagine it?—thrown away in a clause that went something like, “the faculty, who donate their time, come from….”

Yes, yes, these are apparently those lazy, do-nothing professors, about whom Walker suggested that more might be expected of them. What are they doing on Wednesday nights? Teaching in a library on the south side of town, since that’s where these people live. And all this home-cooked food? Why do I really feel that it’s far more likely to have been cooked in a west-side-of-town kitchen, and brought in in the professor’s car? Mind you—just a hunch….

In what may be the most telling paragraph of a recent article on the program, the costs of the program are discussed:

Costs for each student, including tuition and books, while in the two-semester Odyssey course is about $4,200. Expenses to support alumni are about $140,000 to $160,000 a year, Auerbach said.

        
Say what? It costs only $4,200 to give this experience? This experience that so many of its alums say has changed their lives? Why in the world aren't we sending 30,000 of these guys into programs like this, all across the state? But here’s the answer, which I bring to you as a graph:




Right—what’s this about? Here’s the header:

Rates Of Black Male Incarceration By State, 2012


Happily, we live in our electronic age, so I can tell Governor Walker quite easily what his prison system is costing him: 800 million bucks in 2012, with an average cost of 37,994 dollars per year per inmate. And I could tell him to forget ideology, to forget noble principles, to screw any worry about human cost and suffering and families torn apart and poor women going by public transportation to visit their sons and husbands and boyfriends. Oh, and the baby was often on the woman’s lap—I know, since I took in Puerto Rico the same mionivan  that stopped at the prison—and so the woman would hand the baby to a stranger, get out of the car, and we would all matter-of-factly pass the child—one after another of us in the sweltering van that held 12-if-anorexic or 8-if-normal-sized but that never left until, in fact, there were eighteen. Oh—plus the baby. All of this, governor, is quite extraneous.

But I could tell you—having worked for the biggest bastard in town, a small company called Walmart—that no businessman would think twice about the numbers: the risible 4,200 bucks that we would have to spend to change somebody’s life around (oh, and by the way, become a productive member of society, thus paying taxes) versus caging them for a year at 37,000 bucks a year. Oh, and what is the average prison sentence, and the rate of recidivism?

Yes, governor, I could tell you all this, but I ask myself—I who no longer live in the state, who no longer need to care about the state, who have a beach to visit and a cello to play—yes, I ask myself. I could certainly tell you, but…

…would you listen?


Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Our Kids

Whoever they were, and whatever they thought, it can certainly be said that there were enough of them: 200,000 according to the organizers of the affair, and each and everyone one of them was out there defending the family, since its most recent attack is something called “curriculo de género” and if the Puerto Rican family doesn’t survive this onslaught from the government, well, it won’t be because they didn’t try. There were loud speakers, whistles, vuvuzelas, home-made placards, and some more slick affairs, the most arresting of which was this:



Yes—it means what you think: No Books, Let’s not damage our children.

Because it was all about children—children whose innocence was going to be robbed from them, as you could have heard by going to YouTube and listening to the video published by prporlafamilia.com. Heartbreaking to hear the little voice lisping, “Mami, why are3 they taking away my innocence?” Who could not be affected?

So 200,000 people came to my town to protest this outrage, and shouldn’t I figure out what it is? But it was difficult, since here’s what the secretary of the Department of Education has to say:

Enfatizó que el nuevo currículo y la carta circular sobre perspectiva de género aún no están listas. Asimismo, reiteró que no se comprarán libros porque “es un tema que se incorporará de manera transversal en los ofrecimientos currículares de todos los niveles escolares y se implementará de acuerdo con la edad y el nivel escolar”.

Short translation: the new curriculum and the letter announcing it isn’t ready yet, nor have any books been bought. But that was a problem for the protesters, who had this to show on their website:




Right—so the book is called Nuestra Sexualidad, and supposedly it has pictures that would make a marine blush. True, the book, according to the Department of Education, was meant for the teachers only, and was recalled months after having been distributed…but could anyone seriously believe that lie? Of course not!

So various leaders of various churches herded up the faithful, and they were sent out to clamor for the innocence of their children. And then there was the meeting with the governor, who gave up an hour and a half of his time; one of the organizers of the event, a cardiologist named César Vázquez who is spokesman for Puerto Rico Por la Familia, had neither heart nor stomach for the meeting, and stormed out of the meeting after five minutes, and then announced to the waiting press that the affair had been that most atrocious of things: una falta de respeto,

Well, the governor didn’t think it had been, and claimed that at the end of the meeting, the other members of the groups organizing the march had asked the Gov to take selfies with them, since degenerate and innocence-robbing or not, hey …he still the governor!

The ironic thing is that a number of my Facebook friends were all in support of the affair, since they are evangelicals as well as parents. So I can tell you: These are wonderful people, good people, people who would be appalled at any injustice done from hatred or malice.

Which makes it hard for me, since another Facebook friend had this to say:

Just sub out "education on gender and sexuality" for "gay marriage" and "kids" for "gay people"

Well, yesterday was a hard day for me, since having 200,000 fundamentalist Christians on my doorstep was daunting, and could the computer do any better? Of course not, since I was absorbed reading about the guy in Denmark who killed two people—apparently, according to The New York Times, he wasn’t really radicalized, just pissed off, and isn’t that nice to know!—and then the twenty Christians that ISIS beheaded, and then the 250 Jewish graves that got desecrated in France. Oh, and the day was grey and rainy, which didn’t much help.

Nor did it help when the social networks published the picture below:




Right—the first time I saw it, I found it chilling too, though it was years ago in a Catholic church in a very good neighborhood. Still, just as there are some images that you cannot use, there are certain gestures you cannot make. So half of the Internet was publishing photos of German crowds gesticulating in a similar fashion in the 1940’s, and the other half of the Internet was claiming that only a pervert couldn’t see that they were raising their hands to GOD!

Well, I suppose I brought it on myself—at least partially—since didn’t all of us gay people press the buttons? After all, we were out there marching, raising hell, going off to pour blood on the Reagan White House lawn, doing die-ins. So now the other side, alarmed into activity, is streaming in the streets. Did I expect anything less?

I suppose not. But now I’m thinking that it’s time to move on, time for the next big fight, time to declare that the fight for marriage equality has been won, and that we, as gay people, need to look to what is and has always been more important. And at the risk of sounding evangelical, that’s our…

…kids.

Yes, since every one of those 200,000 people out there yesterday has kids, nephews, nieces, grandchildren…and what is their reaction going to be when one of those kids comes home and tells his mother / father / uncle or aunt that he or she is gay? Why am I not hearing the sound of champagne bottles popping?

Which is why, somehow, the news that this Chinese film has had more than one hundred million views is particularly cheering. Here’s what David Badash had to say:
"Homosexuality was decriminalized in China in 1997, and in the early 2000's it was removed from the list of mental illnesses," THR (The Hollywood Reporter) writes. "But there is a deeply held Chinese belief that children are required to marry and bear offspring to continue the family line, which means homosexuality is still heavily stigmatized. Because of this, the Chinese New Year family gathering can be a harrowing experience for gays and lesbians."

Well, we all came out, and it wasn’t easy, but it was worth it. Now we have a harder job in front of us, since it’s too easy to dismiss 200,000 people as religious crazies. Even if they were, what would it matter? The gay community has to realize: Those 200,000 people are raising—some of them…

…our kids. 


Wednesday, February 11, 2015

On the Licit Use of Jacuzzis

It constituted absolutely fraudulent—and possibly criminal—use of a Jacuzzi, and if my own level of stress hadn’t long past crossed—OK, limped across—the finishing line of impending insanity and death, I would have complained to the manager of the hotel about it.

We were in St. Thomas, where we had fled to escape a street festival—which was actually an invasion of 500,000 youngsters who were getting drunker by the hour. Since two years ago Mr. Fernández had been the target of a rum bottle flung by a group of these youths—I was still retrieving bits of it the following December, on those rare occasions when I decided to clean—it became clear: Retreat was the sensible alternative. And however expensive taking a forced vacation might be, the alternative was worse.

So we were in a Jacuzzi in St. Thomas, soaking the year 2014 away: We had lost a beloved cat, we had both been ill for a quarter of the year with the chikungunya, and we seemingly had settled into the lowest part of the U of happiness—our fifties, when worries about aging parents, about impending retirement, about errant children, make this the least happy decade of life. We had, in short, utterly earned a life pass to the Jacuzzi, even if we never again faced an unpleasant moment for the rest of our lives. And so the hot water was blasting away at muscles that made the cables of the Golden Gate Bridge look limp, when a very nice couple from Minnesota—Mary Jane and Allen—joined us in the Jacuzzi.

Joan Didion once wrote that hotels were social constructs, by which she meant that anybody who was staying at the hotel—and who could be paying to do so—would be perfectly fine to watch your stuff—or even your kids—on the beach as you threw yourself in the water. True, the gentleman in the red t-shirt with the news in white: “Mr. President, I built my business?” I didn’t have to, and certainly didn’t want to, spend time with him, but that wasn’t the point. And that was? That however much he wasn’t, there was a way that he was, one of us.

So hotels offer the possibility, or rather, the function like a kind of debutante ball for potential friends: Everybody there was eligible and we got to choose. And so the couple who joined us very quickly climbed onto the A list, since all of a sudden, and with no coordination, we have begun to present ourselves as husband and husband, and correct diplomatically those who call us “friends,” or “partners,” or whatever is less offensive to more conservative ideologies.

Has anyone ever written about the dayliness of discrimination? Probably not, since my computer had to be taught “dayliness,” and since it doesn’t know that discrimination is seldom a gale, but too often a leaking faucet. Which means that the first time we stayed in a country inn in Puerto Rico, over twenty years ago, we were both nervous: Would they let us in? Would it be a problem, two gay men in a room? Would other guests stare, whisper, leave the room? We breathed a sigh of relief  when no eyebrows were raised.

Right—so that weekend a month ago in St. Thomas? Well, we wrote down “husband,” as each other’s relation to the other, and never imagined that it would be a problem. And there’s something more: People are more clued in, and don’t jump in to impose friendship or any other relationship on us. So we spent the weekend gently cluing in the world, and guess what? Nobody had a panic attack.

Least of all the couple from Minnesota, mentioned above, who remarked that they had gotten married in Minnesota after nine years of living together, since weddings? Well, who could take seriously a 23-year kid in a rented tuxedo who was making the ludicrous promise to love and obey to an equally clueless—and ridiculously clad—girl? But in Minnesota, after the marriage ban was lifted, an amazing diversity of ages, races, families came out and were desperate finally to legalize their relationships. And so, said Mary Jane, the very thing that was supposed to decimate the institution of marriage had actually strengthened it. And they had gotten married, and their relationship was different, and better, somehow. And was that the case with us?

The morning of our arrival to St. Thomas, I had awoken in San Juan tense, irritable, anxious about not having a printed boarding pass, worried about the cats, and utterly exhausted, since the sheer effort of getting away seemed enormous. So my reaction to Raf, when he enquired why there were never enough white socks? It was entirely unspoken, and for those of you married, you can skip the next paragraph:

There are never enough white socks—and thanks ever so much for pointing out this appalling if not horrific situation, since I will definitely add that to the urgent list of matters that I alone attend to—since there is only one person who washes white socks, and that is the person who overlooks the white socks that you take off and throw all over the place and that person washes only those which are in the hamper with the whites. So if you would like, I can take time away from cutting the weed trees with a hand saw in the back balcony, thereby offending a woman with considerable resources and clout, and go running around the apartment in search of little errant white socks!

Full disclosure—I am the one who throws my socks around.

Which isn’t the point. And the point is that, while I savored my response greatly, I also savored it privately. And so when Mary Jane asked: Had marriage changed our relationship, and for the better? Both of us looked at the other—one of those long looks that you have in relationships, in which you know your answer, and wonder about the others.

“Yes,” we said in unison.

And so we talked: Mary Jane is a writer and activist, and they both had travelled to Wisconsin, to protest with thousands of others the Walker administration’s attack on unions. Nor was Mary Jane limited to just activism, she also knew immediately about the totally bizarre things that immigrants or the sons thereof got up to, presumably to whittle away the endless Wisconsin winters.

“Oh, you mean like the Dickeyville Grotto?”

How could I have forgotten?

“Why didn’t you ever take me there?” cried Mr. Fernández, appalled at my treason. Why not—who could not want to see this:




Even better, this, with its almost Victorian zeal for self-and-other-improvement:




Yes, under the Papal flag and the American Flag are embedded—according to the website…

…in stone, mortar and bright colored objects-collected materials from all over the world. These include colored glass, gems, antique heirlooms of pottery or porcelain, stalagmites and stalactites, sea shells, starfish, petrified sea urchins and fossils, and a variety of corals, amber glass, agate, quartz, ores, such as iron, copper and lead, fool's gold, rock crystals, onyx, amethyst and coal, petrified wood and moss…

…the telling and teaching words, “religion” and “patriotism,” the two concepts which the venerable Father Mathias Wernerus held dear.

And Wernerus would be? Well, in a letter quoted in the website, he signs off as “the Builder:” Here’s what he has to say:

It is about five years now that this work was started. Many reasons urged me to put up 'Religion in stone and Patriotism in Stone.' The main reason why it was done I could not reveal. The last day will tell you more about that. I can only say that Almighty God and his Blessed Mother, in whose honor we worked, blessed us in such a way that 'we built better than we knew.' Thanks to His almost visible blessing from Heaven, we made the formerly unknown village the point of attraction for countless thousands of people. God's wonderful material collected from all parts of the world has been piled up in such a way that it appeals to rich and poor, to educated and uneducated, to men, women and children alike. Future generations will still enjoy the fruit of our labor and will bless the man that conceived and built this thing. Thanks be to God."

Well, it was a not-so-subtle message to protestant Americans: Catholics can be just as patriotic as the rest of the country, and according to Wikipedia, the Grotto (always capitalizes in the official website, so it seems wrong not to here as well) attracts 40,000 to 60,000 people a year. Among which might have been Raf and I, but it was often a good idea to use a bit of judgment about where to take Mr. Fernández, since he had seriously been on the verge of social disaster at the informal musicale I had taken him to, at the gracious home of a friend.

It was an event I remember frequently, since I am on most days playing Bach suites in the Poet’s Passage, and what if I am playing at the level at which the lady—those decades ago—sang her Schubert lied? Because she “dressed” it, not for the opera, but rather in the way my uncle dressed turkeys. And here, flown directly in from the Internet, is a description of that process:

1 Cut the wings at the first joint. ...
2 Cut the tail right at the base but above the gland. ...
3 Cut the feet at the joint. ...
4 Remove the head at the neck. ...
5 Remove the insides. ...
6 Separate the liver, heart and gizzard from the innards. ...
7 Remove the crop. ...
Save the tail feathers.

All of this can be seen in glorious detail at the website of Georgia Pellegrini, and for anyone wondering why you should save the tail feathers? Georgina has the answer!

They are awfully purty. They make a nice headdress for cocktail parties.

See more at: http://georgiapellegrini.com/2011/04/19/blog/field-dress-turkey/#sthash.hmk2y9L3.dpuf  :

OK—so the singer at the musicale had removed the heart, gizzards, and liver from the innards of her Schubert song, and fortunately, we were at the back of the room—or maybe it had become the salon—since we had made the fatal mistake of looking at each, not in the way we had looked at each when Mary Jane had asked, had getting married changed our relationship? And had we wondered not at our own but the others answer?

No, we were young, we were in love, and it was apparent what was in our four eyes: rampaging and nearly-impossible-to-suppress hilarity. So the singer warbled and wobbled from one flat, shrill note to the next, and her accompanist was a model of solemnity as he stumbled his way through the score: At one point they became badly disengaged in the process, and glared at each with apparent annoyance.

It’s a kind of torture, wanting to laugh and not being able to, and the only other thing to be done about it was:

1.     NOT look at the other
2.     NOT breathe
3.     Pray for deliverance

So with that behind us, I was going to take Mr. Fernández to Dickeyville? To look at things like this, about which there is this description:

Visitors from far and near again and again told the builder that the flower pots that stand on either side of the Holy Ghost Church are some of the most beautiful they have ever seen.




So we sat, Mary Jane and Allen and my ungrottoed but anyway still-my-husband and I and were both in Wisconsin and in the Jacuzzi, where two or three of us had every right to be. Because I don’t know about Mary Jane, but Allen?

…stay tuned!