‘It’s old,
Marc’ I tell myself. For the last thirty years (or thirty decades?) it’s been
the same story. And even though the dioceses of San Juan, Mayagüez, and Caguas
have handed over the documents, the bishop of
Arecibo is standing firm. He’s not gonna hand them over. The Catholic
Church, you see, first has to abuse these kids, and then it turns around and
“protects” their privacy.
“I really
think men should be barred from running religions,” I told Pablo. It was hardly
a felicitous choice, since Pablo is a minister. But he’s gay, so he got it….
I told him
because I had told myself—this ranting has got to stop. First you became
obsessed with Joyce
DiDonato, now it’s the Catholic Church. And besides, the Catholic Church is
as open as a Kansas prairie compared to the Jehovah’s Witnesses. If memory
serves, the video I watched last weekend claims that the Jehovah’s Witnesses
organization has a database of 23, 720 reports of sexual abuse of minors, And,
like you-know-what, their policy is to report to the Vati…sorry, that’s their
headquarters in Brooklyn. Then, the pastor-or-elder-or-whatever is told to
handle it internally. But guess what? Church policy requires that for anything
to be settled, there must be two—hey, Marc, where’s that famous flare for
punctuation?—TWO
witnesses.
See what I
mean about men in religion?
I knew they
were crazy—how crazy I didn’t know. Want an example? Well, Charles Taze Russell,
the founder of the denomination, had the really bad habit of announcing the end
of the world (added value, Readers: think twice about this when establishing
your religion…). He did it several times, and farmers did crazy things like not
planting their fields—since why bother? Oh, and some people sold their homes.
So it was
all a bit embarrassing when the deadlines passed, but not a problem, because
Russell—who must have been quick of feet—came up with an explanation. Jesus had
come back—but invisibly! And you know what? It may have been true, because,
look—it’s just little me, sitting in a café in Old San Juan. And there are 7.9
million people out there—including two in the plaza right now standing next to
a cardboard placard saying “What does the Bible REALLY say?”—who completely
believe in the visible return of our savior. So the odds are that Jesus really
did come back…
What else
do these guys believe?
Well, it
may be that my brain was fogged after reading the word—and dimly remembering
its meaning—eschatology. (And why am I reminded of Dorothy Parker, just
now, who, when asked to use horticulture in a sentence, came up with “You can lead a horticulture,
but you can’t make her think?”) At any rate, I read the paragraph below three
times, and then went off to eat a snicker doodle, just to get the blood sugar
up a bit. And guess what? I still don’t get it. For anyone out there who really
needs to know, here
it is:
A
central teaching of Jehovah's Witnesses is that the current world era, or
"system of things", entered the "last days" in 1914
and faces imminent destruction through intervention by God and Jesus Christ,
leading to deliverance for those who worship God acceptably.[191] They consider all other
present-day religions to be false, identifying them with "Babylon the
Great", or the "harlot", of Revelation 17,[192] and believe that they will
soon be destroyed by the United Nations,
which they believe is represented in scripture by the scarlet-colored
wild beast of Revelation chapter 17. This development will mark the
beginning of the "great
tribulation".[193] Satan will subsequently attack Jehovah's Witnesses, an action
that will prompt God to begin the war of Armageddon, during which
all forms of government and all people not counted as Christ's
"sheep", or true followers, will be destroyed. After Armageddon, God
will extend his heavenly kingdom to include earth, which will be transformed
into a paradise similar to the Garden of Eden.[194] After Armageddon, most of
those who had died before God's intervention will gradually be resurrected
during "judgment day" lasting for one thousand years. This
judgment will be based on their actions after resurrection rather than past
deeds. At the end of the thousand years, a final test will take place when
Satan is released to mislead perfect mankind. Those who fail will be destroyed,
along with Satan and his demons. The end result will be a fully tested,
glorified human race. Christ will then hand all authority back to God.
All I can
think is that God—oooops, that’s Jehovah, sorry about that—put these people on
earth to make the Mormons
look mainstream….
OK—I’ll
tell you what you already may know: the JWs prohibit blood transfusions,
saluting the flag, joining the armed forces, celebrating birthdays and holidays.
In addition, the religion is strongly patriarchal and conservative. Men lead
and women are submissive, though men, according to Wikipedia, are encouraged to listen to their
wives’ and children’s thoughts—thanks guys!
What if
someone goes off the track?
Well, that
can be a problem—since, in the first place, contact with any other religion is
strongly discouraged. But if it’s really bad, the sinner is
disfellowshipped (ah, computer, at last we agree!) and then shunned. So that
means your family can talk to you, and any business obligations (especially
those with a contract involved) can be done—but that’s it. Oh, and elders can
invite you to repent and thus be reinstated (something I was hoping would be
called refellowshipped, but no luck).
So the woman
in the video of last weekend endured physical and sexual abuse, as did her
children, and what was the advice? Go home, be more submissive, and pray
harder.
It was, in
short, a sort of Sophie’s
choice: she could
give up everything and save her kids, or she could throw her kids to the
wolves, or rather, the wolf. Guess what she chose?
I told
myself—I have to step back. This is my sanity, here. No more rants, Marc!
So consider
the case of Wells
Cunningham, whom YouTube—adept
at tracking my history—suggested I watch. Well, I knew the Handel-Halvorsen duo, but what
was the story with the man, Halvorsen himself? Is it right to have spent so
much time with the JWs, and to know nothing about Johan Halvorsen, 1864 to
1935? Well, here he is, since cute guys have a special place in this blog:
Halvorsen
was a Norwegian violinist, conductor and composer of—among other
things—incidental music for plays. Oh, and he married Grieg’s—yes, that Grieg—niece. And he’s
known for just a few pieces, of which the passacaglia below is one. And another one? The Entry March of
the Boyars, which
you can find on YouTube,
and to which you can listen to the first minute and then safely go off to do
something else. Don’t worry, you won’t have missed anything….
And Wells
Cunningham, the cellist? Wait—not only is he an amazing cellist, but he also
plays the violin—as he does in the clip below—the piano and the guitar. And
damn, who is he, and where did he get that amazing technique? With a nod to Malcolm Gladwell, this
guy got to 10,000 hours and then decided to do it all over again.
Well, he’s
a graduate of the University of Miami and Eastman School of Music, and the
principal cellist of the New
World Symphony—or perhaps used to be. And he’s done work with popular
artists like Jennifer
López and Marc Anthony.
So I
listened to the Handel-Halvorsen, and then I listened to Cunningham play the 24th
caprice of Paganini, and was
impressed enough to send myself the clip. It arrived in my inbox with the
notation: this message has no content.
Absolutely
true, I thought, the Paganini certainly doesn’t have any content, so why
bother? So I turned to the second symphony of Halvorsen—which actually wasn’t
too bad.
There are
lands I’ll never get to, and that’s all right, I decided. I’ll never have
Cunningham’s technique, for example. I’ll never have faith, or—perhaps—follow a
spiritual path. But a nice, Nordic symphony?
Ah, I can
go there!
No comments:
Post a Comment