McConnell
matter-of-factly told me he likely helped write Bush’s 2004 remarks endorsing
the constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. Even now the gay speechwriter
defends that course. “I believed the president was taking a principled
position, and the words he spoke on that issue were always reasonable and
tolerant. That hasn’t always been the spirit of the debate, but it’s always
been the spirit of George W. Bush. There was never a day I wasn’t proud of him
and the vice president.”
(Full article here.)
It’s reasonable and tolerant to endorse legislation that restricts an essential human right? And you’re gay, and you’re writing the speech? Oh, and everybody knows you’re gay, since you’re bringing your boyfriend to White House activities?
It’s reasonable and tolerant to endorse legislation that restricts an essential human right? And you’re gay, and you’re writing the speech? Oh, and everybody knows you’re gay, since you’re bringing your boyfriend to White House activities?
If any of
this makes sense to you, you’re firmly in the closet. Wait—make it
stronger—you’re a mote of dust on the top shelf of the closet. But it turns out
that McConnell was
hardly the only gay staffer at the White House: there were more
than seventy of them, a number that has surprised everybody.
By all
accounts, Bush was a gracious man who, initially, was hardly the most
vehemently homophobic Republican (remember Pat Buchanan?) True, two or three
years into his term, he embraced
the constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, but he had appointed openly
gay people and committed
significant funds to combating AIDS in Africa.
Nor was he
the only Republican to go to bat for gay people: there was Ronald Reagan, who as far
back as 1978 came out and opposed the Briggs Initiative,
which would have forbidden gay people to teach in the public schools. Here’s what a long-term
Democrat said about Reagan:
“Never
have I been treated more graciously by a human being. He turned opinion around
and saved that election for us,” Mixner said. “We would have been in deep
trouble. He just thought it was wrong and came out against it.”
Curiously,
after not having thought about the Briggs Initiative for years, it’s cropped
up twice in the last two days, since I spent a fair amount of time
contemplating Troy Perry,
the founder of the Metropolitan
Community Church, a denomination that currently has 222 congregations in 37
countries.
Born in
Northern Florida in 1940, Perry always felt the call to preach—his aunt had
been a snake-handling pastor in another state. So he got married, got ordained,
and had two kids. Then a sex partner outed him at work.
It happened
in those days, and the result was predictable: he was immediately dismissed and
the head of the church council threatened to tell his wife. So Perry lost his
wife—whom he loved—his kids, and his job.
And if all
that weren’t enough, when he finally met a guy he loved, the man dumped him,
leading him to attempt suicide. After a period of depression, he went on to
found his church, with a ministry specifically for LGBT folk.
It’s always
felt a little bogus to me—why should gay people want to associate with a
religion that has some significant homophobic baggage? Shouldn’t we get over
it, stop wanting to be accepted, stop needing to be religious? And why does it
feel that starting our own church is sad, in a way?
That said,
Perry has balls of the most polished brass. They burned down three
churches—one incident left 32 people dead. And when the Briggs’ Initiative
came up, Perry went on a 17-day hunger fast
to raise the money to help defeat the measure. And every Valentine’s Day for
years, he and his now-husband went down to the county clerk’s office to ask for
a marriage license. When he finally got married, he came back to California and
sued the state to recognize his marriage.
He’s fought
every battle, and seen a number of victories; he also is a shining example of
the power of one person to move mountains. And if I have not been given the
gift of faith, I can admire someone who has, and who has led his life according
to his beliefs. For those of us who are out and proud, it’s hard not to wonder
what seventy gay men and women working in the Bush White House might have
accomplished.
It's so sad that faith in a person whose whole raison d'etre was to teach tolerance, love for the outsider and excluded, and forgiveness, and whose only criticism was of hypocritical religious people should have been used to justify intolerance and exclusion, and create a level of hypocricy that would make Christ cringe. The claim of representing Christian ideals has become a cover for what in reality has been lust for power, greed and bigotry. I'm not ashamed to be Christian, but I'm ashamed of those whose poison has shamed Christianity.
ReplyDeletesomebody--maybe in the article you sent me--said that it's harder for a person of faith to come out now than for gay people, and in many ways I can understand that….
ReplyDelete