Can it be true? Because if so, my mood is seriously out of
sync with my reality.
Yeah? I thought I would score at least an 80—after all, I’m
a white male. Hey, that should account for something, right? But either
the test is screwy, or I’m not getting something. Because question after
question asked about things that, yes, put me ou8t of the mainstream.
Religion, for example. Has anyone tried to convert me to his
or her beliefs? Well, yeah, but that never seemed too big a deal to me. And has
anyone in the workplace imposed his or her beliefs on me? Again, yes—there was
that very beautiful, and very life-sized crèche that appeared one Christmas in
the Human Resources department at Walmart. But no worries—I spoke to the
director of the department, and it vanished. (Now that I’ve been laid off, I’m
sure it’s a regular fixture each year….) OK—and I was sufficiently open with my
students that one of them took me aside, and told me that the rumors were
spreading that I was an atheist.
“What rumors,” I asked, “I am an atheist!”
All right—I’m a little lacking in the religion department….
Then, of course, there’s sexuality, and I was expecting
that. Yes, people have called me a fag, I was once chased down a street in
Boston (I have long legs—something that arguably is a privilege, or at least it
seemed so at the time—so again, no worries). Discrimination in the workplace?
Nothing overt that I can point a finger to, but I wouldn’t be surprised. Put it
this way—being gay didn’t help.
Money? Well, I’ve felt poor, and not, at the same time. I
remember those days of having less than 500 bucks in the bank—but I also had a
job, and I felt secure there. Granted, I was underemployed, and definitely
underpaid, but I also had a long-term relationship, and he was doing
great. And no, I’ve never worried about being able to afford a doctor’s visit,
or gone to bed hungry.
Are my parents alive?
Seemed like a dumb question, though I suppose that having live parents
might be a boon (assuming, of course, they were any good at parenthood).
Anyway, I’m six months short of 60, so having live parents is both unlikely
and, perhaps, a distinct disadvantage (my father would be 107, and almost
certainly in terrible shape….)
Right, so then we came to illnesses, specifically mental
illnesses. Depression? Check! Suicidal ideation? Check! Actual suicide
attempts? Fortunately, no. But still, it weighed against me.
What was odd was what wasn’t on the test. Physical
health, for example—which, despite high blood pressure, has been remarkably
good. And having been in severe pain, recently, I have a renewed appreciation
for having lived so many years without disability.
The questionnaire—if I remember correctly—asked if I had
grown up in a house without a television. Well, yeah—but only because my
parents preferred reading. Oh, and in those days, there was a hill between them
and the local PBS station, which made transmission spotty. So what was the
point?
It was, I suppose, an unusual household. Yes, you always had
to lift your feet, every time you drove over a puddle, but that wasn’t the
point. The point was that there was a cello in the back seat, and my father
was driving me to a rehearsal of the Wisconsin Youth Symphony Orchestra.
And then, of course, there was the fact that I had a father
at all. And that he was there, driving me around, and not somewhere else. Oh,
and he taught me a lot: how to treat bank presidents and janitors, for example (hint—the
same). How to look at every side of an issue. Oh, and how to hate, just hate,
the bastards who get away with shit.
Maybe it’s true that I’ve been or am underprivileged. Both
of my brothers, when my mother was fasting to her death, told me essentially
the same thing: I had had a harder life than they.
At the time I dismissed the idea, then I began to see how it
could be true. Then I began to wonder: well, so what? Maybe my life had been
harder, and maybe other people—brothers included—had had it easier. But I had
never felt unduly unprivileged; in fact, I thought I was, for the most part,
supremely lucky.
Think the test is bogus!
The test is skewed toward the bulge in the bell curve, so those of us who didn't have a television because we don't watch tv are marked underpivileged. (It doesn't ask if your home has a library.) Those of us wearing old clothes because 1) we hate to shop, and 2) they're just getting comfortable, damn it! are marked underprivileged. You get the picture. The most underprivileged thing I can think of is to lack curiosity.
ReplyDeleteYou know, when I came to the clothes question, I immediately thought of Gertrude Stein, who said you could either buy clothes or art. So there she was, in that awful brown dress, stand in front of a wall full of Picassos! now that's pirivilege!
ReplyDelete