Showing posts with label Charities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charities. Show all posts

Saturday, September 27, 2014

Hey Josh, You In?

OK—it’s one of those videos that Hallmark could have produced, and any diabetics out there should perhaps take a shot more of insulin. But for all of that, a lot of trite expressions have some truth in them. Remember, “today is the first day of the rest of your life?” Believe it or not, that poster was hanging on the studio door in Gunnar Johansen’s house. And Johansen was no sentimentalist, but rather the first Artist in Residence at any university, and a grand student of Liszt.

So what’s the video all about? Well, I first came across it—if memory serves—in some Malcolm Gladwell book. The Washington Post had decided to see what would happen if they put Joshua Bell, an extraordinary violinist who’s got a three million dollar fiddle (called the Gibson ex Huberman Strad), in jeans and a baseball cap, instead of a tuxedo, and in a Metro station at 7 AM instead of Carnegie Hall at 8 PM. Would anyone pay attention? Or is the truism that site and expectation dictate our experience…well, true?

Contrary to the video, the Post reports that 37 people stopped and listened. Right—but how many went by? Almost 2,000.

It leads to interesting questions. By and large, the street musicians I hear range from medium to awful. I have heard, however, a few absolutely world-class musicians—women and men who deserve the stage of any major hall in the world.

Maybe some will get there. But my suspicion? The road to Carnegie hall has both a lot of tricky exits and a lot of twists. There is personality, for example: for some people, the pressure of performing for hundreds of people, some who have saved for months to hear you, others who are tired after a day’s work and are being dragged to the concert by their spouse…well, some very good musicians can’t handle that pressure.

But Bell isn’t one of them: in fact, Bell said that the most disconcerting thing was the silence that followed the performance. And though not explicitly stated, the implication is that Bell wasn’t happy with his performance—he needed to feed off the energy of the audience.

In my case, I buckled miserably under pressure, and choked in every audition I took. Note for any readers wanting to pass a pleasant day: don’t walk onto a stage with your sweaty fingers, your roiling stomach, your Sahara mouth, produce horrendous sounds for two minutes, only to hear “gracias!” That being your cue to limp off the stage, avoid the eyes of your competitors, all of whom have left earprints on the stage doors, so ardent were they to hear every wretched noise you made.

Right—I’ve never done it, but still, given the choice of falling down a 200-foot elevator shaft and going through one of those auditions again? Wouldn’t be an easy decision.

So that meant that I put the cello down, and went off to work in the corporate world. And here I confess, I would have heard instantly how good a violinist Bell was: I’m conservatory-trained and have spent decades playing the Bach cello suites, and hearing the violin partitas. But would I have stopped? I didn’t have a time clock to punch, my boss arrived to the office hours after I did, nobody would have snarled if it had been seven AM instead of my usual 6:45.

But the sad truth? For me to listen to such beauty, to open myself to so much loveliness, only to tear myself away, close up again, put on the corporate face as I put on my tie every morning…I might not have stopped. I might have shuddered, remembered someone I came close to being but never became, and hurried away. Time to answer those emails!

My release came, and though the slip wasn’t pink, but a lawyerly-prepared package, I was escorted by “Loss Prevention” out of the building, the inside of which I have never seen again. So Lady, the owner of the café where I work, challenged me, when I proposed picking up the cello again, “why not do it here and let us be part of the process?” Meaning pouring a lot of DW40 on some very rusty fingers, and seeing what sounds would come from a decade-mute cello?  Why not play in the open mic area of the sister shop, where there are chairs and sofas? If it’s horrible, people can move on—otherwise, they can stay.

Casals once said (disclaimer—I think he said, but he’s not around to dispute it) that playing in a café is excellent preparation for a musician. Why? Because people are talking, laughing, clinking silver and plate, and generally treating you like you are the least important person in the room. So that first day in the café? Horrible, and made worse by the fact that my husband and his family were there to give me “support.” Guys? When you’re about to commit the musical equivalent of a seizure accompanied by projectile vomiting, you don’t want family and friends there….

I got through it, though it was 49.9% flight, and only 50.1% fight. And so I’ve done it for months now, and guess what? It’s no big deal, and if people listen, great. If they throw money into the cello case, I donate it to four excellent charities. And if, as happened a week ago, a young man of merciless beauty comes in (with his girl-friend, dammit) just as I had put the cello in the case, well, what else was there to do? He filmed me with his iPad, I gazing at him all the time, and the Bach?

…never sounded better!

It worked out, you see. The performance anxiety is—at least partially—over. But put me in Carnegie Hall, which was where Bell—at age 17—played with the St. Louis Symphony? Who knows? What I now know is that I could make the progression from café to church service to joint recital to….Carnegie Hall?

Because here it’s time to confess—I’m an excellent cellist. That, if I had anything to do with it, would be vanity. But as anyone who has felt the flow of playing well can attest, there’s an eerie feeling that someone else has borrowed your fiddle and your fingers. You’re less a musician than a medium….

So Bell has gone on to a distinguished career, though is he always going to be the “guy-who-played-in-the-subway?”

Yes.

And now he’s going back there, this time at noon, and with publicity at 12:30 on 30 September. And in addition to being there, he’ll be with nine young musicians, with whom he’s been working in the National Young Arts Program. Here—drawn from their website is what they do:

 YoungArts provides emerging artists (ages 15-18 or grades 10-12) with life-changing experiences with renowned mentors, access to significant scholarships, national recognition, and other opportunities throughout their careers to help ensure that the nation’s most outstanding young artists are encouraged to pursue careers in the arts. Support is offered in ten artistic disciplines: cinematic arts, dance, design arts, jazz, music, photography, theater, visual arts, voice and writing.

 Bell’s other point in going back underground? Well, classical musicians have got to get into the public arena and start playing in cafes, coffee houses, bookstores, bars, anywhere where real people are, and then something will happen.

People will love the music we play.

My dream? Get a cellist or violinist in every café in the country at 5 PM, when people are leaving work, not rushing to it. Let people buy a beer, drink it, and listen to Bach. Contribute whatever money you collect to the excellent organizations: here’s the link….

Josh—you in?





Friday, October 4, 2013

Musactivism

Well, I found out about the site just as everybody else did—by watching a man named Matt confess that he had killed a man by driving drunk, and he was going to plead guilty and pay the price. And so I went to the website and checked it out. And there was Matthew Cordle, 22, starting right out by saying, “I killed a man.”
Then, his pixilated face appears, and he tells the story—he struggles with depression every day, and sometimes he drinks just to get out of his head. So on 22 June of this year, he was out drinking with friends, go shitfaced-drunk, and was driving on the wrong side of the highway, causing a direct collision. Vincent Canzani, 61, the driver of the other car, lost his life.
Half way through the video, Cordle introduces himself and shows his face unpixilated. And he admits that he consulted attorneys, who told him that they could manipulate the system enough to get him either a reduced sentence or off the hook completely. But Cordle says no, and then writes his promise on the little promise cards that the website provides, “I will take full responsibility for what I’ve done.”
So why is he doing this? First, in order not to disgrace the memory of the man he killed. And second, so that he can beg everyone—don’t drink and drive.
Well, the video got over two and a half million hits on YouTube, one of which was I, and then the news came out.
Cordle pleaded not guilty.
Because of a technicality. It turns out that in order to get a random judge, Cordle needed to plead not guilty initially. Later, he could change his plea—and he promised he would.
And in fact he did, on September 18. And here’s what CNN reports:
Cordle will be sentenced October 10. Ron O'Brien, the attorney who is prosecuting the case, told CNN that Cordle faces a maximum sentence of 8½ years in prison for his charges.
All right—that’s Cordle. Now—what’s the deal with the website, becauseIsaidIwould.com?
It was set up by Alex Sheen, as a tribute to his father, who died of cancer, and who had a particular talent—he kept his word. And so Alex gave up his day job, and started doing various projects. He decided to send fifty kids with cancer to Disneyland—instead, he was able to send one hundred kids. Then there was the decision to walk across his home state of Ohio. Why? As a tribute to the three victims of Ariel Castro—who had been held in captivity and sexually abused for ten years. And then there were the two guys he ran into, who were actually walking across the United States, to raise awareness of human trafficking. According to their Facebook page, the two—Shannon Sprowal and Jay Atlas—are today in Colorado, but expect to get into New Mexico tomorrow. Here’s the link to their page.
Alex hit on the idea of promise cards—here are some samples:

So here’s the deal—you make a promise, you write it down, and you give it to someone who will care for it. Then, after you’ve fulfilled your promise, you ask for your card back, as a reminder that you are a person of your word.
Alex, by the way, will send you ten promise cards free; alternatively, you can print your own from the site.
Well, I made a promise, and I feel bad about not keeping it. I said that I would play an hour of Bach suites and ask for donations to four wonderful charities, which the philosopher Peter Singer has identified as the most efficient and effective. And best of all, by contributing to these charities, you can make a tremendous difference. Here’s what Singer has to say:
However, it is also possible to make extremely effective donations towards the world's poorest people. Because they have so little money, every dollar you give can make a tremendous difference — especially if spent on the world's most efficient aid programs. Read on to see just how much you could achieve and how little it would really cost you. 
And here are the charities:
Against Malaria Foundation. Why? More than a million people die each year of malaria, 70% of them are kids under 5. A 3$ net can prevent the disease—and 100% of your money goes to the nets. Best of all, you can see where your nets are distributed. Here’s the website: http://www.againstmalaria.com
Schistosomiasis Control Initiative. The initiative aims to control and then eliminate the parasitical disease schistosomiasis, which afflicts more than 400 million people in sub-Saharan Africa. Untreated, schistosomiasis leads to kidney, liver, and spleen damage; 76 cents will provide a dose of the drug needed to treat and cure. Here’s the website: http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/schisto
Deworm The World. 600 million kids around the world need to be dewormed; less than fifty cents is all it takes to treat one kid. This organization has treated 40 million children in 27 countries. Best, treating kids leads to significantly improved school attendance—a nice added benefit. Here’s the website:   http://www.dewormtheworld.org
Project Healthy Children. The project aims to confront malnutrition by food fortification, essentially supplying the vitamins that you and I take for granted. But a child goes blind every minute—80% of them because of vitamin deficiency. Zinc deficiency kills 800,000 children a year; Vitamin A deficiency kills 2.5 million children under age 5 every year. Here’s the website:  http://projecthealthychildren.org  
And here’s the promise I made in that blog post of 30 June 2013.
I’ll play Bach suites once a week in the café where I am spending so profligately my money. I’ll put up a little sign announcing the charity of the week, and ask for donations.
Let’s call it musactivism….

Monday, August 26, 2013

The Beatitudes Banned?

Every day, the same guy hits me up for food, and I have to confess. I’m annoyed with him.
Annoyed because he hits me up twice or three times in a day—shouldn’t once be enough? Annoyed because I give him three dollars—enough for bread, ham and orange juice, and he wants five dollars for “a hamburger at Burger King.” Annoyed because he now has taken to coming into the café where I “work” and asking for money while I’m busy writing. In short, he isn’t acting like a properly grateful beggar—I have become his bank. And so? I am not a cheerful giver, which I should be.
Right—so why don’t I tell him to go to hell?
Because he’s hungry, dammit.
How do I know? Well, he’s rail thin. And I see him “selling” parking spaces on the street, as well as pushing shopping carts with food for customers at the grocery store. In short, he’s struggling, and he’s just getting by.
I write this because Susan has sent a link to a church website in Raleigh, North Carolina, which has apparently banned churches from giving out food to the homeless. The church, Love Wins, had for 6 years given coffee and sandwiches to anybody who came by on Saturday and Sunday mornings. They were recently told this is illegal.
Second confession—I have not been able to access the link, and I suspect that everybody else in the country is having the same problem. I did read, however, news of the affair in The Daily Kos, and here’s the link.
In chasing down this improbable but seemingly true story, I came upon the interesting news that many major American cities have done the same. In Philadelphia, Mayor Nutter has prohibited groups from distributing food in city parks, saying the practice is unsanitary and lacking in dignity. (Hey—just the facts; that’s what he said…)
And it goes on and on—New York City, Orlando, Dallas, Las Vegas and Houston have all restricted feeding the poor in some ways. Here’s what one blogger wrote:
New York City has banned all food donations to government-run homeless shelters because the bureaucrats there are concerned that the donated food will not be "nutritious" enough.
Yes, this is really true.
The following is from a recent Fox News article....
The Bloomberg administration is now taking the term “food police” to new depths, blocking food donations to all government-run facilities that serve the city’s homeless.
In conjunction with a mayoral task force and the Health Department, the Department of Homeless Services recently started enforcing new nutritional rules for food served at city shelters. Since DHS can’t assess the nutritional content of donated food, shelters have to turn away good Samaritans.
You know, I’ve often believed that the internal combustion engine was the ruination of America. Why? Because too many of us wake up, leave our houses, drive to work, come home, eat, and go to sleep. Maybe it would be better to take the bus, as I do. Then people would see, as I once did, a whole family in a parked car at five in the morning. They were all asleep, all except the father, sitting in the driver’s seat. Nor will I forget his eyes, which plainly told me—“this is all we have, all we can do.”
Or people would see—as I do—the guy who routinely goes into the dumpster up the street, fishing out scraps of food. Oh, and the guy in Houston who did so in March of this year? Here’s what the Houston Chronicle said:
James Kelly was hungry and looking for something to eat. He tried to find it in a trash bin near Houston City Hall.
For that, the man, who said he spent about nine years in the Navy but fell on hard times, was ticketed by a Houston police officer.
According to his copy of the citation, Kelly, 44, was charged on Thursday with "disturbing the contents of a garbage can in (the) downtown business district."
"I was just basically looking for something to eat," Kelly said Monday night. "I wasn't in a real good mood."
Houston, by the way, passed an ordinance in 2012 requiring organizations to get a permit to distribute food, and socking any organization in violation with a $500 fine.
You know, there are days when I think the Victorians did it better. However bad the workhouse was, it provided shelter and food. I give it to you, which would you prefer, the streets or this?

Workhouse in Ripon, England

Sunday, June 30, 2013

A Little, and a Long Way

OK—this is profoundly embarrassing. I am sitting in a café, which is where I spend a lot of my time. There are two reasons for the hours I spend here: the first is a need for people, since writing can be a solitary profession; the second is that I’m too lazy to make my own food.
I am therefore wasting huge sums of money, something that nobody but the shop owner could condone. And the worst thing? Though I am barely making enough money to keep afloat—as is Mr. Fernández—we are in the richest 4.0% of the world.
I know this because I went to a site called givingwhatwecan.org and entered a (probably too high) estimate of our combined incomes after taxes. And there, right on the page, was the button for “how rich am I?”
The sum I entered was 50,000 USD. OK, what happens when I put in 100,000 USD? “You are in the richest 0.15% of the world’s population,” was the answer. And 1,000,000 USD? Less that 0.1%.
The site is absolutely fascinating, as was the talk by the philosopher Peter Singer, which you can see below. I live perfectly well on $30,000 a year; I am 56; I am willing to donate 10% of my income; I will “retire” at age 65. OK, so I went to another page to see what effect I could have. And guess what? In the 9 years of giving, I would have saved 11 lives, I would have saved 491 years of healthy life, and I would have produced 9,000 years of school attendance.
But wait—suppose I retired at age 85? How would the world fare?
Total you would earn: 870,000 
Total you would donate: 87,000
Lives you could save: 35
Years of healthy life you could save: 1,582
Years of school attendance you'd produce: 29,000
That’s the graphic that popped up at me.
How is it possible? Singer has the explanation:
However, it is also possible to make extremely effective donations towards the world's poorest people. Because they have so little money, every dollar you give can make a tremendous difference — especially if spent on the world's most efficient aid programs. Read on to see just how much you could achieve and how little it would really cost you. 
 OK—so now you know what you’re worth, relative to the world population; as well, you know the effect of contributing whatever percent of your income you’ve chosen; now, where should your money go?
And it’s an important question, because the right charity can be a hundred times more effective than another, less effective one. So which charity gives you the biggest bang for the buck?
Here again, Singer sails through with the answer. He recommends four charities that are the most effective. Here are the four.
Against Malaria Foundation. Why? More than a million people die each year of malaria, 70% of them are kids under 5. A 3$ net can prevent the disease—and 100% of your money goes to the nets. Best of all, you can see where your nets are distributed.  Here’s the website: http://www.againstmalaria.com
Schistosomiasis Control Initiative. The initiative aims to control and then eliminate the parasitical disease schistosomiasis, which afflicts more than 400 million people in sub-Saharan Africa. Untreated, schistosomiasis leads to kidney, liver, and spleen damage; 76 cents will provide a dose of the drug needed to treat and cure. Here’s the website. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/schisto
Deworm The World. 600 million kids around the world need to be dewormed; less than fifty cents is all it takes to treat one kid. This organization has treated 40 million children in 27 countries. Best, treating kids leads to significantly improved school attendance—a nice added benefit. Here’s the website.   http://www.dewormtheworld.org
Project Healthy Children. The project aims to confront malnutrition by food fortification, essentially supplying the vitamins that you and I take for granted. But a child goes blind every minute—80% of them because of vitamin deficiency. Zinc deficiency kills 800,000 children a year; Vitamin A deficiency kills 2.5 million children under age 5 every year. Here’s the website.  http://projecthealthychildren.org  
Singer came up with the idea of asking people to pledge 10% of their income until the day they retire. Here’s the pledge:
The Pledge to Give
I recognize that I can use part of my income to do a significant amount of good in the developing world. Since I can live well enough on a smaller income, I pledge that from today until the day I retire, I shall give at least ten percent of what I earn to whichever organizations can most effectively use it to help people in developing countries. I make this pledge freely, openly, and without regret.
As well, he came up with the idea of forming chapters of people who are working together to practice effective charity. So far, there are 10 chapters, 317 members, and $126,300,000 pledged.
OK—this is what I’m gonna do. Every day, I’m going to put my change into a piggy bank, which I will empty when full. I’ll take it to the bank, and get it changed; then, I’ll send a quarter of that amount to each one of the four charities.
Second strategy, I’ll play Bach suites once a week in the café where I am spending so profligately my money. I’ll put up a little sign announcing the charity of the week, and ask for donations.
Singer makes two further points—the materialist rat race of working to make money to spend money on stuff that doesn’t make us feel better but does mean we have to go back to work the next day is ridiculous. But oddly, giving money to a worthy cause does make us feel better. So shouldn’t we change trains?
Second, in terms of human impact, the money you donate may be the most important thing—by far—you’ll ever do in your life.