Showing posts with label Susan Brownmiller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Susan Brownmiller. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Step up to the plate, guys!

What happened?
The feminist movement peaked in my middle teens; I remember reading The Second Sex when I was fifteen or so. When I was eighteen, Brownmiller came out with her classic work, Against Our Will, which had a famous, and very controversial statement, coming to you here through Wikipedia:
Brownmiller argues that rape had been hitherto defined by men rather than women, and that men use, and all men benefit from the use of, rape as a means of perpetuating male dominance by keeping all women in a state of fear.
As a gay man, it seemed pretty hard, that phrase “all men benefit from the use of,” but reading the book several times helped get it clear. Her point, if I remember it correctly, is that all women live in a state of fear, of some degree of intensity; it’s part of the warp and weft of our society. And that fear is used, consciously or not, to men’s advantage.
It was an invigorating time, a time of political correctness that I miss, in a sense. Women burning bras? Well, that was women taking back their bodies; no, I’m not gonna be uncomfortable to please you. Women boycotting beauty contests? Hey, has any guy ever stood up in a scanty thong and paraded his ass around a stage for the world to see? Oh, and then get asked how they would solve world hunger?
So for a few years women said to men, “it’s fifty / fifty, buddy; you clean the bathroom, I’ll clean the kitchen….”
Then, all of a sudden I began to hear the first chinks, “I’m not a feminist,” women would say, “but I do believe in equal rights for women.”
This message was puzzling. I had no problem with being a feminist—I considered myself one, although whether that was possible was argued among radical theorists. But if they wanted me, I was willing to be in their trenches.
Then it appeared men were subtly pushing back, and women were retreating. About that time, I moved to Puerto Rico; my finger was off the cultural pulse of the United States. But I can tell you that—always with exceptions—women in Puerto Rico were not faring well. My first reaction, seeing them going to work, was, “hunh? Who goes to a party at 9AM?” Wearing three-inch stiletto heels for eight hours a day seemed a little over the top.
They were especially not doing very well, because many, many of them were working eight hours a day, picking up the kids from Mamita, grabbing “food” at KFC, studying with the kids until nine PM, doing a load of wash, organizing clothes and food for the next day, and falling into bed, for six hours sleep. They did this for five days; Saturday they cleaned the house.
Nor, I’m sorry to say—and again with exceptions—was the average Puerto Rican guy much use. Look, my father and mother had this deal going: he would go out and deal with the world; she would stay put and deal with the house and kids. They modified it, tweaked it, but he was always there, and holding up his share of the bargain. Puerto Rican men tend to marry at age 18, and then drift off by age 23.
So all of this was in my mind when I saw a clip on CNN about revenge porn. Right, I live in a different age—I know that—so I had to check it out: what was revenge porn?
You’re a young woman, you’ve had some wine, you’re back home, undressing with your boyfriend, who takes—perhaps with your permission, perhaps not—a photo of you, appearing not as you usually present yourself to the world. But that’s OK because you trust him, and he would never do anything to harm you, and…
Three years later, you break up. And what does the guy do? Goes on to a website and posts your picture, with your name, last name, and telephone number.
It can get worse. That gray-haired lady you call “Mother?” She gets an email with the heading, “your daughter is a slut.” The boss gets one, too. Oh, forget the boss—you don’t have one because this cyber criminal has put the photos over your Facebook page and guess what? Every recruiter is checking Facebook. So no job for you!
You were stupid, of course. You should never have allowed him to take the picture. Your passwords—of course you shouldn’t have shared them. You were also young, and he weighed 200 pounds, you weighed 110. So that bottle of wine hit you harder.
And as a victim pointed out, statements like the ones above—however true—are just victim-blaming, the equivalent of “what were you wearing at the time of the attack?”
Much of this happened to a woman, Holly Jacobs, who has spent four years trying to get her photos taken off websites, who has taken her aggressor to court in a civil suit, and who has started a website called endrevengeporn.com. She has also started a petition, which I’ve just signed, to make this form of harassment a crime. Here’s the link: http://www.endrevengeporn.com/petition.html
Maybe it’s time to go back to Brownmiller, regain some of that militant fervor, restart the work of raising boys, not future predators.
It may also be time to hear male voices speaking up and claiming, as the TED speaker below does, that “women’s issues” are also men’s issues. Molly Jacobs presumably has a father—is he unaffected by this “women’s issue?” Is he gonna snigger when someone calls a woman a “slut?” Wink, when someone puts a hand on a woman’s rump?
Maybe it’s time to be responsible, guys.

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Despair, Impatience and Sin

 Susan strikes again, with words as keenly chiseled as a reredos:
-->

Religion is the greatest obstacle to living a godly life. Like all human institutions, religions are corrupted to suit human purposes, which are overwhelmingly about power and money, and subject to the fears and superstitions of the ignorant. So what's a person who loves God, his/her fellow creatures and the planet to do? Julian of Norwich recognizes only two sins: impatience and despair. Those are the two tough ones. I'm impatient for human beings to get our act together, and I despair that we ever will. One small ray of hope: things like war and the death penalty are at least controversial now, and we don't pack up the family and a picnic to view public hangings as a form of entertainment.
-->

Well, yes. Despair and impatience come all to easily to me as well. And yesterday, as I wondered about “legitimate” rape, it was all the more difficult to keep from sin.

OK—let’s try to be fair.  I’m sure—I’m at least trying to be sure—that Akin meant something other than there is “legitimate” rape. He probably meant what used to be called forcible rape. A maiden is sleeping virtuously in her bedroom at night, her flannel nightgown covering all her nasty bits. An intruder jimmies the window, steals into her bedroom, and puts the gun to her temple. Her pupils constrict in terror.

That sort of stuff.

This is in contrast to the “other” kind of rape. A woman goes to a bar by herself. She’s wearing her best clothes, looking good. She meets a guy, he buys her a drink, they talk. She flirts. At some point, in the car going to his apartment, or in the apartment itself, it turns nasty. She says no, he overpowers her.

What happened?

Rape.

But to all too many people, there’s still that voice—“she lured him on”—in the back of their heads.

However, the representative seems to have gone further. Apparently, he really believes that in cases of “forcible” rape the woman’s body will reject the spermatozoa, and she will not get pregnant.

I tried, Susan, I really tried to give this argument the benefit of the doubt. It’s said that more male children are born in times of war than peace. Is it true? Well, I looked it up and, yes, it appears so. I also remembered a story I read in my Walmart days of women being more receptive to a stranger’s sperm than to her regular partner’s. Therefore accounting for more pregnancies as a result of a casual fling than in a monogamous relationship.

Too tired to look that up….

Or rather, I realized that it wasn’t the point. My belief? The senator doesn’t want anyone to have an abortion. Period. As a result of rape, as a result of poverty, as a result of a life- threatening condition—zip. NO ABORTIONS!

OK—but why twist science to justify it?

Oh, and by the way, the representative is on the House Committee of Science, Spaceand Technology.

Does this inspire confidence?

And then I began to wonder about how men have justified rape in the past. One of the myths common in my childhood was that no woman could be penetrated against her will. The idea was that the vaginal opening was a sphincter, which would automatically snap closed if needed. So any penetration meant implicit consent.

And then I remembered the book that changed it all—Against Our Will. Yup, Susan Brownmiller. Anybody remember her?

What she said was quite simple. Rape is an act of aggression. No is no. There’s no difference between the maiden sleeping in her bed and the girl out for a good time in a bar.

She went further. Here—as always!—is WikiPedia:

Brownmiller argues that rape had been hitherto defined by men rather than women, and that men use, and all men benefit from the use of, rape as a means of perpetuating male dominance by keeping all women in a state of fear.

Wow! When I read that in 1975 it set my head spinning. Me, a gay guy benefiting from rape?

“Of course you’re racist—you’re living—we’re all living—in a racist society,” said a black lover of mine, when I asked him if he thought I was racist. And Brownmiller, I suspect, would argue much the same. At the age of 55, a perfect Kinsey 7—I’m a pretty safe guy for a woman to be around. But the fear of rape changes every woman’s life, and mine as well.

Right—so they were strong words to hear. I read Against Our Will several times and eventually understood it and agreed with it. And after the initial shock, I no longer reacted defensively to the notion that all men benefit from the use of rape.

And now, I yearn for the earnest directness of the late sixties, seventies. Brownmiller came slugging out with her book, knocked us out of the water, changed the dialogue, maybe changed our beliefs. 

And now we have this little weasel trying to pull us back into the rap again.

So no, Susan and Julian of Norwich, I shall not sin. I’ll just say what should be said of all bad thinking and dishonest motivation.

Ne fas!