Wednesday, July 31, 2013

On Beleaguered Wisconsin

It started two years ago, when Republican governor Scott Walker decided to go after the unions in state government in Wisconsin.
And it’s still going on.
I followed it only remotely at the time, being in active anticipatory dread about the lay off I knew awaited me. But I remember seeing the protests on television, as I walked through the lunchroom before 7AM at the home office of Wal-Mart Puerto Rico in Caguas. There were, at its height, 100,000 people jammed into the Wisconsin state capitol, all protesting a bill aimed at lessening a 3.6 billion dollar state deficit. How was Walker proposing to do that? By eliminating the right of the state unions to bargain collectively.
Facts: Wisconsin became the first state to allow for unions in the public sector in 1959. While union membership was in the past higher in the private sector than in the public, that situation has now changed. Currently, about 36% of government workers are in unions, as compared to six or seven percent in the private sector.
When Walker announced his bill—called the Budget Repair Bill by those favoring Walker or the Union Busting Bill by those not—protesters took over the capitol. There were sleeping areas, a medic station, and food distribution areas. Signs were everywhere. And the capitol police, in general, acted professionally.
In the midst of the fracas, 14 state senators—all of the Democrats in the Senate—left the state and went to Chicago in order to prevent Republicans from having a quorum. That drew everybody’s attention, as well as did the massive crowds in and around the state capitol. And who were all those people? Fans of Walker said they were union organizers from out of state.
Government workers began calling in sick, and doctors were handing out notes excusing them; later, Walker would try and go after those doctors. And so the world watched as the drama in Wisconsin continued. Eventually, the Democrat senators came back. Here’s Wikipedia’s account of how the budget bill was passed:
On February 22, 2011 Assembly Republicans began procedures to move the bill to a vote on February 22 while Democrats submitted dozens of amendments and conducted speeches.[60] At 1:00 am on February 25, following sixty hours of debate,[61] the final amendments had been defeated and the Republican leadership of the Wisconsin State Assembly cut off debate as well as the public hearing and moved quickly to pass the budget repair bill in a sudden vote. The vote was 51 in favor and 17 opposed, with 28 representatives not voting.[61] The final vote took place without warning, and the time allowed for voting was so short (lasting only 5–15 s)[62] that fewer than half of the Democratic representatives were able to vote; many reportedly pushed the voting button as hard as possible but it did not register.[63] Four Republican representatives voted against the bill.[64]
In essence, Walker carried the day—though not without a fight. The budget bill was challenged in court, and upheld. Walker faced a recall election and won. But guess what?
The protests never entirely went away. People began gathering at noon to sing—songs like, “hit the road, Scott, and don’t you come back no more.” Or how about, “we’ll keep singing ‘til justice is done; we’re not going away, oh Scotty?”
OK—so what did Scott do?
He required groups of more than four people to have a permit to protest in the capitol.
Four people??!!
C’mon, Gov, if five secretaries leave for lunch together, is that a protest?
Apparently so. Here’s what Senate Majority Leader sent around to the legislative offices: 
“If you are in the vicinity of the illegal demonstrations that have been taking place over the noon hour in the rotunda, you will be considered part of the protests and are subject to being ticketed.”
The right of the people peaceably to assemble, to consult for the common good, and to petition the government, or any department thereof, shall never be abridged.”
Not unreasonably—in fact, completely reasonably—protesters felt that requiring a permit was an abridgment of their right to peaceably assemble. And of course it is—what happens if the government says no? Are citizens just supposed to go home? It’s the old slippery slope—the next thing would be for groups to be forced to pay a bond for security, or insurance, or “interruption” to the workplace.

Wisconsin has a proud tradition of progressive, clean, transparent government. Scott Walker has severely tarnished that reputation with low-down, dirty tactics. This attack on the right to assemble is just another example of the politics of attack and polarization.
Well, the protesters went to court, and the court issued a temporary ruling stating that the state can require a permit for protesters of twenty or more people.
No deal, said the protesters. So in the last week or so, over 100 citations were issued. Yesterday, 30 were issued, as a group of 100 people sang and 50 watched.
And the police?
You be the judge—watch the videos below.




4 comments:

  1. Thanks, Marc. The protests today are about much more than public employee rights to collective bargaining. They're about corruption in our state government, about illegal procedures in the state legislature, about voter suppression, about draconian cuts to public education combined with taxpayer-funded vouchers to private schools (big donors to Walker), about violation of our federal and state constitutional rights, about mandated vaginal ultrasounds before a woman and her doctor can make a decision about her health care, and much, much more.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I know--and these people scare the life out of me....

    ReplyDelete
  3. The point of the crackdown is clearly intimidation, to keep the general public afraid of joining in the sing along and of the regulars who have been gathering to sing every weekday at noon since March 11, 2011. So in spite of the fact that no real crime has been committed--the citations issued aren't much more than a glorified traffic ticket, $200 each--participants are handcuffed so tightly that their hands are numb and their wrists are rubbed raw. Most citation recipients (myself included) plead not guilty and ask for a jury trial. My citation was for my participation on October 31, 2011. My trial has been postponed several times and is now scheduled for early September.

    One frequent participant was arrested twice today (he went back into the rotunda after receiving his first citation). He was taken to the county lockup and charged with the misdemeanors of resisting/obstructing and trespassing--trespassing! in a public building. His bail was $700.

    Owing to the growing number of arrests, costs are mounting. Participants in the sing along have set up a First Amendment Protection Fund to help arrestees with court costs (not lawyers fees). Donations may be made here: http://solidaritysingalong.org/

    Many thanks for covering this, Marc. We really appreciate it!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This situation is completely outrageous. Thank you, Mary Ray, for standing up and singing!

    ReplyDelete